Comparison Of Naso Faring And Oro Pharynx Swab Samples On Positivity Rate For Covid – 19 With The Reverse Transcription Method Pcr (Rt–Pcr) In The Lab. Rsud Pcr. City Padang Sidempuan

Authors

  • Yanna Rotua Sihombing Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam
  • Romauli Anna Teresia Marbun Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam
  • Lenni Rismayanti Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam
  • Ratih Anggraeni Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam
  • Octavian Ashido Nababan Universitas Evarina
  • Kristian Cahayani Zebua Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35451/jfm.v6i2.2021

Keywords:

COVID-19, nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) could be a coronavirus that causes COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 is classified as an RNA infection that can cause gentle to severe respiratory diseases. Viral contaminations proceed to extend quickly, so it is critical to prevent the spread of the infection through nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs within the community. The point of this consider was to decide the exactness of nasopharyngeal or pharyngeal spread testing and the inspiration rate in RSUD patients. Padang Sidempuan City This think about was performed by collecting 20 nasopharyngeal swabs and 20 pharyngeal swabs from RSUD patients. City of Padang Sidempuan Infection testing was performed within the research facility by turn around transcriptase polymerase chain response (RT-PCR). Information were analyzed employing a chi-square test with p < 0.05. Judging from the nasopharynx and oropharynx positive rate comes about, the nasopharynx positive rate esteem is higher than the nasopharynx positive rate esteem, indeed in case it is the same persistent. The conclusion of this ponder is that the discovery of SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal swab will be more precise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yanna Rotua Sihombing, Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam

Dosen bidang Farmasi di Institut Kesehatan Medistra Lubuk Pakam, tertarik pada bidang ilmu Farmakologi di cabang ilmu Farmakoekonomi dengan penelitian mengenai CEA (Cost Effectiveness Analysis), CUA (Cost Utility Analysis) dan Kepatuhan pasien (Adherence).

References

Bai, H., Cai., X., Zhang, X. (2020). Perbandingan tes berbasis PCR, immunoassay, dan Crispr. Pracetak OSF. https: //doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2019.

Calame, A., Mazza, L., Renzoni, A., Kaiser, L., dan Schibler, M., 2020. Sensitivitas sampel nasofaring, orofaring, dan pencuci hidung dalam mendeteksi SARS-CoV-2 tanpa adanya peralatan pengambilan sampel.Jurnal Mikrobiologi Klinis & Penyakit Infeksi Eropa, halaman 1-5.Pusat Pengendalian dan Pencegahan Penyakit (CDC). 2020. Virus Corona https: //www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/index.html Disaccess, 15 Januari 2020.

CDC. 2021. Pedoman Sementara Pengumpulan, Penanganan, dan Pengujian Spesimen Klinis dari Individu yang Terkait dengan Penyakit Virus Corona 2019 (Covid-19). Informasi lebih lanjut (online) di https: //www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2 019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-exemplare.html [Diagnosis 15 Februari 2021].

Chen, S., Yang, J., Yang, W., Wang, C. dan Bärnighausen, T., 2020. Tindakan terhadap infeksi virus corona baru di Tiongkok selama gerakan massal Tahun Baru. Lancet, 395(10226), halaman 764-766.

De Wit E, van Dremaeren N, Falzarano D, Münster VJ. SARS dan MERS: 4.444 temuan terkini tentang virus corona yang baru muncul. Mikrobiologi Nat Rev. 2016;14(8): 523- 34.

FDA. 2021.Tes Virus Corona Kematian Grand Lagen 2019. Tersedia (online) https: //www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/coronavirus-disease-2019-testing-basics [Diakses 32 Mei Guclu, E., Kroglu, M., Yurumez, Y., Toptan, H., Kose, E., Gunesyu, F., Karabay, O. (2020).Perbandingan sampel air liur dan usap oronasofaring dalam diagnosis molekuler Covid-1. Jurnal Asosiasi Medis Brasil, 66(8), 1116-1121. (Online) https: //doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.66.8.1116.

Guo L, Ren L, Yang S, Xiao M, Chang, Yang F, dkk. Membuat profil respons humoral dini untuk diagnosis penyakit virus corona baru (COVID-19).Clin Infect This. 2020; Diterbitkan online pada 28 Maret.DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.05.20030502.

Habibzadeh P, Sajadi MM, Emami A, Karimi MH, Yadolhiye M, Kuceki M, dkk. (2020).Tingkat re-positif tes RT-PCR pada pasien yang telah pulih dari infeksi COVID-19. Biokemia Medica, 30(3): 1-2.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2020. Pedoman kesiapsiagaan penyakit virus corona (Covid-19). Februari 2020.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Pedoman Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit Virus Corona (COVID-19), Juli 2020. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2020.

Li X, Geng M, Peng Y, Meng L, Lu S. Imunopatogenesis molekuler dan diagnosis infeksi virus corona baru.

J Tegas Anal. 2020; Diterbitkan online pada tanggal 5 Maret. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.03.001.

Manzoor, S., 2020.Perbandingan usap orofaring dan nasofaring untuk mendeteksi SARS COV-2 pada pasien infeksi virus corona Chest, 158(4), P.A2

Nagura-Ikeda, M. et al. (2020). Evaluasi klinis air liur yang dikumpulkan sendiri dengan transkripsi balik kuantitatif-PCR (RT-qPCR), RT-qPCR langsung, amplifikasi isotermal yang dimediasi loop transkripsi balik, dan pengujian antigen cepat untuk diagnosis Covid-19. Jurnal Mikrobiologi Klinis, 58(9), hlm.1-9.

Narumanshi, A. lainnya. (2020). Evaluasi lapangan terhadap kinerja tes diagnostik antigen SARS-Cov-2 cepat menggunakan sampel nasofaring di Uganda. Jurnal Internasional Penyakit Menular.doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112454. Notoatomojo, S. (2017).Metode Neue Pennertian. Jakarta : Lineka Cipta.

Palmas, G., Moriondo, M., Trapani, S., Ricci, S., Calistri, E., Pisano, L., Perferri, G., Galli, L., Venturini, E., Indolfi, G.dan Azari, C. Usap hidung sebagai sampel klinis yang direkomendasikan untuk pengujian Covid-19 pediatrik. Jurnal Penyakit Menular Anak, 39(9), halaman e267-e270.

Patel, MR, Carroll, D., Ussery, E., Whitham, H., Elkins, CA, Noble Wang, J., Rasheed, JK, Lu, X., Lindstrom, S., Bowen, V., dan Waller, J., 2021. Perbandingan tes usap orofaring dan tes usap nasofaring untuk diagnosis infeksi virus corona 2019 - Amerika Serikat, Januari 2020, Februari 2020.

Penyakit Menular Klinis, 72(3), halaman 482-485. Patologi Klinik dan Laboratorium Kedokteran Indonesia. Panduan untuk melakukan pengujian cepat SARS-CoV-2 (TCM) dan pengujian reaksi berantai polimerase (PCR). Jakarta. April 2020. Musim semi. 1-18

Porte, L., dkk. (2020).Evaluasi tes deteksi cepat berbasis antigen baru untuk diagnosis SARS-CoV-2 pada sampel pernapasan. Jurnal Internasional Penyakit Menular, 99, hlm.328-333. https: //doi.10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098.

Scohy, A., Anantharajah, A., Bodeus, M., Kabamba, B., Verroken, A., Rodriguez-Villaloboos, H. (2020). Low performance of rapid Antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J Clin Virol; 129:104455.

Supriyanta, B., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Sensitivitas, spesifisitas, nilai prediksi positif, nilai prediksi negative dan akurasi metode Lateral Flow Immuno Assay (LFIA) dengan mikroskopis untuk diagnosis gonore. Puinovakesmas, 2(2), 40-44. (Online), (https://doi.org/10.29238/puinova.v2i2.1170, diakses 17 Juli 2022).

Sungnak, W., Huang, N., Bécavin, C., Berg, M. and Network, H.L.B., 2020. SARS- CoV-2 entry genes are most h ciliated cells within human airways. ArXiv. ighly expressed in nasal goblet and.

Tahamtan A, Ardebili A. (2020). Real-Time RT-PCR in Covid-19 Detection: Issues Affecting the Results. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 20 (5):1-2.

Tang YW, Schmitz JE, Persing DH, Stratton CW. (2020). Laboratory Diagnosis of Covid-19: Current Issues and Challenges. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 58(6):1,4.

Wahjudi, M. (2020). Kontroversi Metode Deteksi COVID-19 di Indonesia.

Wang, W., Xu, Y., Gao, R., Lu, R., Han, K., Wu, G., & Tan, W. (2020). Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Speciments. JAMA-Journal of The American Medical Association, 23 24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3786.

Wang, H., Liu, Q., Hu, J., Zhou, M., Yu, M.Q., Li, K.Y., Xu, D., Xiao, Y.,Yang, J.Y., Lu, Y.J. and Wang, F., 2020a. Nasopharyngeal swabs aremore sensitive than oropharyngeal swabs for Covid-19 diagnosis andmonitoring the SARS-CoV-2 load. Frontiers in medicine, 7, p.334.

Wang, X., Tan, L., Wang, X., Liu, W., Lu, Y., Cheng, L. and Sun, Z., 2020b. Comparison of nasopharyngeal andoropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 94, pp.107- 109.

World Health Organization. (2020). Global Partnership to Make Available 120 Million Affordable, Quality Covid-19 Rapid Test for Low-and Middle-Income Countries. (online) https://www.who.int/news/item/28-09-2020-global-partnership-to-make-available-120-million-affordable-quality-covid-19-rapid-tests-for-low-and-middle-income-countries.

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation report –126. 2020.

World Health Organization. Situation Report – 10 [Internet]. 2020 [updated 2020 january 30; cited 2020 March 15]. Available from: reports/20200130- sitrep- 10- ncov. pdf?sfvrsn=d0b2e480_2.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Sihombing, Y. R., Romauli Anna Teresia Marbun, Lenni Rismayanti, Ratih Anggraeni, Octavian Ashido Nababan, & Kristian Cahayani Zebua. (2024). Comparison Of Naso Faring And Oro Pharynx Swab Samples On Positivity Rate For Covid – 19 With The Reverse Transcription Method Pcr (Rt–Pcr) In The Lab. Rsud Pcr. City Padang Sidempuan. JURNAL FARMASIMED (JFM), 6(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.35451/jfm.v6i2.2021