Evaluation of Telemedicine Access with Health Insurance: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35451/bne7rx24Keywords:
Telemedicine, mHealth, Health Insurance, Healthcare AccessAbstract
Introduction: Telemedicine transforms healthcare through electronic Communication technologies and offers high-quality medical treatments from a distance. The COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating the adoption of telemedicine, making its integration with insurance financing a strategic step to increase access to healthcare, reduce the financial strain on patients, and ensure continuity of service. Some nations have extended the coverage of private insurance companies and health insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid to include telemedicine services. Objectives: Assess the impact of implementing telemedicine technology in the context of insurance financing and formulate policy recommendations to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of health services. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed, covering studies from 2015 to 2024. The inclusion criteria described telemedicine or telehealth financed by health insurance written in English. Based on the inclusion criteria, seven articles were reviewed in this article. We then assessed the studies’ quality using different research evaluation tools based on the research methods. Results: Health insurance-backed telemedicine has been shown to increase access to healthcare, lessen individuals’ financial burdens, and enhance the standard of medical care. However, several issues, including inadequate infrastructure, low digital literacy, and unclear regulations, continue to impede the use of telemedicine in conjunction with health insurance programs. Adapting to telemedicine presents challenges for elderly populations and people with physical disabilities. Policies, training for healthcare professionals, and technical advancements are required for these services to be inclusive and sustainable. Conclusion: Health insurance-backed telemedicine can improve access and efficiency of care and reduce patients’ financial burdens. By implementing corrective measures, as some countries have successfully done, health systems can maximise the benefits of telemedicine and create more inclusive, efficient, and sustainable health services.
Downloads
References
1. Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens Int [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 21];2:100117. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590973/
2. Bajowala SS, Milosch J, Bansal C. Telemedicine Pays: Billing and Coding Update. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep [Internet]. 2020 Jul 27 [cited 2025 Mar 2];20(10):60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-020-00956-y
3. Wu J, Yang Y, Sun T, He S. Inequalities in unmet health care needs under universal health insurance coverage in China. Health Econ Rev [Internet]. 2024 Jan 2 [cited 2025 Mar 2];14(1):2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-023-00473-4
4. Stoltzfus M, Kaur A, Chawla A, Gupta V, Anamika FNU, Jain R. The role of telemedicine in healthcare: an overview and update. Egypt J Intern Med [Internet]. 2023 Jun 30 [cited 2025 Mar 2];35(1):49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-023-00234-z
5. Carpio-Delgado FD, Bernedo-Moreira DH, Espiritu-Martinez AP, Aguilar-Cruzado JL, Joo-García CE, Mamani-Laura MR, et al. Telemedicine and eHealth Solutions in Clinical Practice. EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol [Internet]. 2023 Oct 30 [cited 2025 Mar 10];9. Available from: https://publications.eai.eu/index.php/phat/article/view/4272
6. Su Z, Li C, Fu H, Wang L, Wu M, Feng X. Development and prospect of telemedicine. Intell Med [Internet]. 2024 Feb [cited 2024 Dec 18];4(1):1–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2667102622000791
7. Ray KN, Mehrotra A, Yabes JG, Kahn JM. Telemedicine and Outpatient Subspecialty Visits Among Pediatric Medicaid Beneficiaries. Acad Pediatr [Internet]. 2020 Jul [cited 2025 Mar 2];20(5):642–51. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876285920301649
8. Castillo VS, Cano CAG, Gonzalez-Argote J. Telemedicine and mHealth Applications for Health Monitoring in Rural Communities in Colombia: A Systematic Review. EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol [Internet]. 2023 May 29 [cited 2024 Nov 24];9(1). Available from: https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eetpht.9.3400
9. Pundziene A, Gerulaitiene N, Bez SM, Georgescu I, Mathieu C, Carrabina-Bordoll J, et al. Value capture and embeddedness in social-purpose-driven ecosystems. A multiple-case study of European digital healthcare platforms. Technovation [Internet]. 2023 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Dec 18];124:102748. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497223000597
10. Are Health Insurance Companies Covering Telemedicine? - Alliance Health [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 21]. Available from: https://www.alliancehealth.com/agency-insight/are-health-insurance-companies-covering-telemedicine/
11. Lazic A, Tilford JM, Davis VP, Brown CC. Association of copayments with healthcare utilization and expenditures among Medicaid enrollees with a substance use disorder. J Subst Use Addict Treat [Internet]. 2024 Jun [cited 2025 Mar 2];161:209314. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2949875924000262
12. Zhang B, Fang Z, Nian K, Sun B, Ji B. The effects of telemedicine on Rotator cuff-related shoulder function and pain symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Orthop Surg [Internet]. 2024 Aug 14 [cited 2025 Mar 2];19(1):478. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04986-4
13. PRISMA statement [Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 24]. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. Available from: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
14. Hong QN, Pluye P, Pierre S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 [Internet]. McGill University; 2018. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf
15. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care [Internet]. 2007 Sep 16 [cited 2024 Nov 24];19(6):349–57. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
16. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e011458.
17. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers [Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 24]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.3233/EFI-180221
18. Al-Moghrabi D, Tsichlaki A, Alkadi S, Fleming PS. How well are dental qualitative studies involving interviews and focus groups reported? J Dent [Internet]. 2019 May [cited 2025 Mar 2];84:44–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300571219300429
19. Bull C, Teede H, Carrandi L, Rigney A, Cusack S, Callander E. Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2022 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Mar 2];12(2):e058952. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e058952
20. Madabhushi V, McLouth CJ, King R, Bhakta A, Beck S, Patel JA. Age and Medicare Insurance are Barriers to Telemedicine Access-A Quality Improvement Project. Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1643–9.
21. Ye J, He L, Beestrum M. Implications for implementation and adoption of telehealth in developing countries: a systematic review of China’s practices and experiences. Npj Digit Med [Internet]. 2023 Sep 18 [cited 2025 Mar 2];6(1):1–14. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00908-6
22. Alhussein M, Patel B, Liu X. Closing the gap: Technology access and telehealth use among older adults in the U.S. Medicare beneficiaries. Telemat Inform Rep [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Nov 21];12:100103. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503023000634
23. Dahlhausen F, Zinner M, Bieske L, Ehlers JP, Boehme P, Fehring L. Physicians’ Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR MHealth UHealth [Internet]. 2021 Nov 23 [cited 2024 Nov 21];9(11):e33012. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663495/
24. Folker AP, Mathiasen K, Lauridsen SM, Stenderup E, Dozeman E, Folker MP. Implementing internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for common mental health disorders: A comparative case study of implementation challenges perceived by therapists and managers in five European internet services. Internet Interv [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Dec 18];11:60–70. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782917301203
25. Zhou L, Li Y, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhang S, Hu X. Perceptions of Telehealth Services Among Rural Lung Cancer Patients in China: A Qualitative Study Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Semin Oncol Nurs [Internet]. 2024 Oct [cited 2024 Nov 21];40(5):151710. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749208124001827
26. Nkurunziza T, Williams W, Kateera F, Riviello R, Niyigena A, Miranda E, et al. mHealth-community health worker telemedicine intervention for surgical site infection diagnosis: a prospective study among women delivering via caesarean section in rural Rwanda. BMJ Glob Health [Internet]. 2022 Jul 28 [cited 2024 Nov 21];7(7):e009365. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341172/
27. Filbay S, Bennell KL, Morello R, Smith L, Hinman RS, Lawford BJ. Exploring experiences with telehealth-delivered allied healthcare services for people with permanent and significant disabilities funded through a national insurance scheme: a qualitative study examining challenges and suggestions to improve services. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2022 Sep 14 [cited 2024 Nov 21];12(9):e065600. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476117/
28. Muller E, Huysmans MA, van Rijssen HJ, Anema JR. Needs, expectations, facilitators, and barriers among insurance physicians related to the use of eHealth in their work: results of a survey. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2023 May 25 [cited 2024 Nov 21];46(11):2374–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2224083
29. Schmitt T, Haarmann A. Financing health promotion, prevention and innovation despite the rising healthcare costs: How can the new German government square the circle? Z Für Evidenz Fortbild Qual Im Gesundheitswesen [Internet]. 2023 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Dec 18];177:95–103. Available from: https://www.zefq-journal.com/article/S1865-9217(22)00180-5/fulltext.
30. Pratiwi AS, Lestari YE, Primadiamanti A. The Relationship of Risk Factors for Medication Error in the Electronic Prescription Prescribing Phase in the Outpatient Pharmacy Installationof Hospital X. JURNAL FARMASIMED (JFM). 2025 Nov 13;8(1):173-83.
31. Abas SN, Surono S, Dania H, Darmawan E. Profile of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients with dan without Diabetes at Prof. Dr. H. Aloei Saboe Regional General Hospital Gorontalo City. JURNAL FARMASIMED (JFM). 2025 Nov 13;8(1):207-12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erlisa Irawati Putri, Diah Ayu Puspandari, Anna Wahyuni Widayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright in each article is the property of the Author.
