Clinical Validation and Application of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Detection and Prediction of Adverse Drug Reactions: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35451/jfm.v9i1.3944Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Adverse Drug Reaction Detection, Prediction, Clinical ValidationAbstract
Background : Adverse drug events (ADEs) account for nearly 50% of preventable medical harm globally and place a burden on health care systems. Conventional pharmacovigilance based on spontaneous reporting faces challenges such as underreporting, low data quality, and delays in detecting safety signals. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being applied to address these limitations, but evidence of their effectiveness and barriers to implementation remain scattered. Objective : To analyze the progress, effectiveness, benefits, and challenges of applying AI in pharmacovigilance, including signal detection, ADE prediction, clinical information extraction, causality assessment, and regulatory integration. Methodology : This study employed a narrative review of articles on AI and ML in pharmacovigilance and drug toxicity prediction. The literature included systematic reviews, scoping reviews, predictive modeling studies, and WHO policy documents. Results: Statistical methods such as PRR, ROR, BCPNN, and MGPS are still used because they are simple and auditable, despite their limited sensitivity. ML models such as Random Forest, XGBoost, logistic regression, and transformers like BERT and GPT show promising performance in the detection and prediction of ADEs, with accuracies of up to 94%. However, external validation, class imbalance, and interpretability remain challenges. Conclusion : AI has the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of pharmacovigilance, but requires improved data quality, real-world validation, model transparency, methodological standardization, and ongoing integration into clinical workflows.
Downloads
References
1. World Health Organization. Medication without harm: policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
2. Chalabianloo N, Sedig K, Rostamzadeh N, Muanda FT, Izzedin L. Machine learning methods for predicting adverse drug events : A systematic review. 2026;(February 2025):422–44.
3. Dimitsaki S, Natsiavas P, Jaulent M christine. Applying AI to Structured Real-World Data for Pharmacovigilance Purposes : Scoping Review Corresponding Author : 2024;26.
4. Nagar A. Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance : advancing drug safety monitoring and regulatory integration. 2025;1–16.
5. Karampatea A, Kassandros K. Systematic review of AI-based models in pharmacoepidemiology for adverse drug event prediction and detection. 2026;(March):1–9.
6. Manek MS, Wiedyaningsih C, Endarti D. A Systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals ’ Knowledge , Attitudes , and Practices Regarding Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Southeast Asia. 2026;1133–45.
7. Jannah M, Sari YO, Almasdy D. GERIATRI DI RUANGAN RAWAT INAP INTERNE SEBUAH SUMATERA BARAT Study Of the Adverse Drug Reaction ( ADR ) On Geriatric Patients in Internal Medicine Inpatient at A Private Hospital in Bukittinggi City , West Sumatera. 2024;6(2).
8. Rekha BH, Hisham SA, Wahab IA, Ali NM, Goh KW. Digital monitoring of medication safety in children : an investigation of ADR signalling techniques in Malaysia. 2024;
9. Wu XW, Song W, Wen L. Develop an ADR prediction system of Chinese herbal injections containing Panax notoginseng saponin : a nested case – control study using machine learning. 2022;1–8.
10. Algarvio RC, Conceição J, Pereira P, Inês R. Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance : a narrative review and practical experience with an expert ‑ defined Bayesian network tool. Int J Clin Pharm [Internet]. 2025;47(4):932–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01975-3
11. Li Y, Tao W, Li Z, Sun Z, Li F, Fenton S, et al. Artificial intelligence-powered pharmacovigilance : A review of machine and deep learning in clinical text-based adverse drug event detection for benchmark datasets. J Biomed Inform [Internet]. 2024;152(February):104621. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104621
12. Syrowatka A, Song W, Amato MG, Foer D, Edrees H, Co Z, et al. Review Key use cases for artificial intelligence to reduce the frequency of adverse drug events : a scoping review. 2022;
13. Khemani B, Malave S, Shinde S, Shukla M. MethodsX AI-driven pharmacovigilance : Enhancing adverse drug reaction detection with deep learning and NLP ✩. MethodsX [Internet]. 2025;15(June):103460. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103460
14. Zhang J, Li H, Zhang Y, Huan J, Ren L, Zhang C, et al. Computational toxicology in drug discovery : applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and. 2025;26(5).
15. Guo W, Liu J, Dong F, Song M, Li Z, Khan KH, et al. Minireview Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction. 2023;1952–73.
16. Bai C, Wu L, Li R, Cao Y, He S, Bo X. Machine Learning-Enabled Drug-Induced Toxicity Prediction. 2025;2413405.
17. El-sappagh HJS, Abuhmed T. Robustness in deep learning models for medical diagnostics : security and adversarial challenges towards robust AI. 2025;
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aditya Putra, Mr. Alvin Dwi Reza, Mr. Rangga Febriyana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright in each article is the property of the Author.























