Profile of Physiological Cost Index in Users of Transtibial Prostheses with SACH Foot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35451/jkf.v9i1.3906Keywords:
Transtibial prosthesis, SACH Foot, Physiological Cost Index, Energy expenditure, WalkingAbstract
Users of transtibial prostheses may experience increased physiological demands during walking because of altered biomechanics and compensatory strategies after amputation. The Physiological Cost Index (PCI) is an indirect index that uses changes in heart rate and walking speed to describe the physiological cost of walking. This study aimed to describe the PCI profile of users of transtibial prostheses with a Solid Ankle Cushion Heel (SACH) Foot. This article used a descriptive analysis of data from 14 unilateral transtibial prosthesis users who used a SACH Foot and met the study criteria. Variables included age, sex, height, body weight, body mass index, resting heart rate, walking heart rate, walking time, walking speed, and PCI. Data were presented as frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, minimums, and maximums. The mean age was 36.36 ± 4.34 years and the mean body mass index was 21.52 ± 0.70 kg/m². Mean resting heart rate was 79.86 ± 1.17 beats/min and increased to 101.71 ± 2.23 beats/min during walking. Mean walking speed was 65.63 ± 4.05 m/min, while mean PCI was 0.334 ± 0.042 beat/meter, with a range of 0.263–0.428 beat/meter. The profile demonstrates a cardiovascular response to walking among SACH Foot users and provides an initial description of walking physiological cost that may support further clinical evaluation.
Downloads
References
[1] Ladlow P, Nightingale TE, McGuigan MP, Bennett AN, Koumanov F, Phillip R, Bilzon JL. Influence of traumatic lower-limb amputation on physical activity, body composition, and cardiometabolic risks: a descriptive preliminary study. PM R. 2023;15(4):413-425. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12854.
[2] Ettema S, Kal E, Houdijk H. General estimates of the energy cost of walking in people with different levels and causes of lower-limb amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021;45(5):417-427. doi:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000035.
[3] Hafner BJ, Halsne EG, Morgan SJ, Morgenroth DC, Humbert AT. Effects of prosthetic feet on metabolic energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PM R. 2022;14(9):1099-1115. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12693.
[4] Lura DJ, Carey SL, Miro RM, Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ. Crossover study of kinematic, kinetic, and metabolic performance of active persons with transtibial amputation using three prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021;33(2):110-117. doi:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000290.
[5] Patra S, Mohanty RK, Das SP. Effect of walking speed on gait parameters and energy expenditure in individuals with unilateral trans-tibial amputation. Function and Disability Journal. 2021;4(1):41. doi:10.32598/fdj.4.41.
[6] Fatati M, Setyawan D, Fikria LH. Perbedaan kecepatan berjalan pada pengguna transtibial prosthesis tipe SACH foot dan single axis foot. Medical Journal of Nusantara. 2024;3(1):23-31. doi:10.55080/mjn.v3i1.595.
[7] Lathouwers E, Baeyens JP, Tassignon B, Gomez F, Cherelle P, Meeusen R, Vanderborght B, De Pauw K. Continuous relative phases of walking with an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: an explorative case-control study. Biomed Eng Online. 2023;22:14. doi:10.1186/s12938-023-01074-2.
[8] Modares Sabzevari MH, Anbarian M, Safari MR, Tabatabai SF, Razi MJ. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of solid ankle cushion heel and dynamic feet during running of individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2022;23(1):126-139. doi:10.32598/RJ.23.1.3126.1.
[9] Guerra G, Smith JD, Yoon EJ. The relationship between balance confidence and center of pressure in lower-limb prosthesis users. Biomechanics. 2023;3(4):561-570. doi:10.3390/biomechanics3040039.
[10] Houdijk H, Blokland IJ, Nazier SA, Castenmiller SV, van den Heuvel I, IJmker T. Effects of handrail and cane support on energy cost of walking in people with different levels and causes of lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(7):1340-1346.e3. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.007.
[11] Von Kaeppler EP, Hetherington A, Donnelley CA, Ali SH, Shirley C, Challa ST, et al. Impact of prostheses on quality of life and functional status of transfemoral amputees in Tanzania. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10:a839. doi:10.4102/ajod.v10i0.839.
[12] Colas-Ribas C, Martinet N, Audat G, Bruneau A, Paysant J, Abraham P. Effects of a microprocessor-controlled ankle-foot unit on energy expenditure, quality of life, and postural stability in persons with transtibial amputation: an unblinded, randomized, controlled, cross-over study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022;46(6):541-548. doi:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000187.
[13] Colvin ZA, Montgomery JR, Grabowski AM. Effects of powered versus passive-elastic ankle foot prostheses on leg muscle activity during level, uphill and downhill walking. R Soc Open Sci. 2022;9(12):220651. doi:10.1098/rsos.220651.
[14] Kim J, et al. The effect of powered ankle prostheses on muscle activity during walking. J Biomech. 2021;124:110573. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110573.
[15] Ikeda AJ, Smit JA, Simon AM, Anarwala SJ, Hargrove LJ. Measuring metabolic energy expenditure with short duration walking tests for individuals with lower limb amputation. PLoS One. 2025;20(3):e0320384. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320384.
[16] Tankink T, Houdijk H, Tabucol J, Leopaldi M, Hijmans JM, Carloni R. Human-in-the-loop optimization of the stiffness and alignment of a prosthetic foot to reduce the metabolic cost of walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2025;33:2823-2833. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3590581.
[17] Muijres W, Afschrift M, Ronsse R, De Groote F. Transtibial amputation increases the metabolic energy needed for stabilizing walking in the sagittal plane. J Appl Physiol. 2026;141(1):71-84. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00877.2025.
[18] Brunelli S, Sancesario A, Iosa M, Delussu AS, Gentileschi N, Bonanni C, Foti C, Traballesi M. Which is the best way to perform the Physiological Cost Index in active individuals with unilateral trans-tibial amputation? Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2019;2(1). doi:10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.32953.
[19] MacGregor J. The objective measurement of physical performance with long-term ambulatory physiological surveillance equipment (LAPSE). In: Stott FD, Raftery EB, Goulding L, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Ambulatory Monitoring. London: Academic Press; 1979. p.29-39.
[20] Nene AV. Physiological cost index of walking in able-bodied adolescents and adults. Clin Rehabil. 1993;7(4):319-326. doi:10.1177/026921559300700408.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cica Tri Mandasari NIngsih, Dody Suprayogi, Syarifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright in each article is the property of the Author.
